JSON
Mahajan P, Shu-Ling C, Gutierrez C, White E, Cher BAY, Freiheit E, Belle A, EMERGE NETWORK , Kaartinen J, Kumar VA, Middleton PM, Ng CJ, Osei-Kwame D, Roth D, Sinja TP, Galwankar S, Nypaver M, Kuppermann N, EKelund U
West J Emerg Med 22 (5) 1037-1044 [2021-08-21; online 2021-08-21]
Emergency departments (ED) globally are addressing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with varying degrees of success. We leveraged the 17-country, Emergency Medicine Education & Research by Global Experts (EMERGE) network and non-EMERGE ED contacts to understand ED emergency preparedness and practices globally when combating the COVID-19 pandemic. We electronically surveyed EMERGE and non-EMERGE EDs from April 3-June 1, 2020 on ED capacity, pandemic preparedness plans, triage methods, staffing, supplies, and communication practices. The survey was available in English, Mandarin Chinese, and Spanish to optimize participation. We analyzed survey responses using descriptive statistics. 74/129 (57%) EDs from 28 countries in all six World Health Organization global regions responded. Most EDs were in Asia (49%), followed by North America (28%), and Europe (14%). Nearly all EDs (97%) developed and implemented protocols for screening, testing, and treating patients with suspected COVID-19 infections. Sixty percent responded that provider staffing/back-up plans were ineffective. Many sites (47/74, 64%) reported staff missing work due to possible illness with the highest provider proportion of COVID-19 exposures and infections among nurses. Despite having disaster plans in place, ED pandemic preparedness and response continue to be a challenge. Global emergency research networks are vital for generating and disseminating large-scale event data, which is particularly important during a pandemic.
PubMed 34546878
DOI 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50358
Crossref 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50358
pii: westjem.2021.3.50358
pmc: PMC8463065