Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Fear of COVID-19: an Online-Based Cross-cultural Study.

Ali M, Uddin Z, Banik PC, Hegazy FA, Zaman S, Ambia ASM, Siddique MKB, Islam R, Khanam F, Bahalul SM, Sharker MA, Hossain F, Ahsan GU

Int J Ment Health Addict - (-) 1-16 [2021-08-30; online 2021-08-30]

The study aimed to measure Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) and fear level towards COVID-19 and explore its cross-cultural variances in knowledge by sociodemographic factors among the general population of 8 different countries over 5 continents. It was a cross-sectional online survey. This survey was conducted in April 2020 among 1296 participants using the "Google Form" platform. Considering the social distancing formula and pandemic situation, we collect data using popular social media networks. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to explore the collected data on KAP, fear, and sociodemographic factors. Overall knowledge score was 9.7 ± 1.7 (out of 12), and gender differences (female vs male: 9.8 ± 1.6 vs 9.5 ± 1.9) were significant (p = 0.008) in the bivariate analysis. Knowledge score variances were found significant in some regions by gender, marital status, and education qualification. The highest and lowest mean knowledge scores were recorded in the Middle East (10.0 ± 1.7) and Europe (9.3 ± 2.0). Despite having a high fear score (22.5 ± 5.6 out of 35), 78.35% of respondents were positively and 81.7% in a good practice level. Fear score rankings: Middle East (1st; 23.8 ± 5.5), Europe (2nd; 23.2 ± 5.8), Africa (3rd; 22.7 ± 5.0), South Asia (4th; 22.1 ± 5.7), Oceania (5th; 21.9 ± 5.8), and North America (6th; 21.7 ± 5.5). Fear and knowledge were not correlated. KAP and fear variation exist among geographical regions. Gender, marital status, and education qualification are factors in knowledge variances for some regions. KAP and fear measures can help health education programs consider some sociodemographic factors and regions during an outbreak of highly contagious disease and uplift a positive attitude and good practice. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11469-021-00638-4.

Category: Public Health

Type: Journal article

PubMed 34483782

DOI 10.1007/s11469-021-00638-4

Crossref 10.1007/s11469-021-00638-4

pii: 638
pmc: PMC8404540

Publications 7.1.2